Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Seneca Scott's avatar

As always, tremendous work!

Expand full comment
Victor Holmes's avatar

I always appreciate Oakland Report's in-depth analyses, but this one was less compelling than others. I actually agree that housing first might be more suited as one of many tools than as the primary mandated policy, but the analysis seems to treat the policy used by the state as a causal variable and the number of homeless people in and out of supportive housing as the response. That's too simple - there is much more going on with the pandemic, the economy, and migration of the homeless population as policy in other regions shifts as well.

My 2c and takeaway: Government funding should leave front-line jurisdictions the freedom to address their own homeless problems as they see fit, and perhaps tie future funding to specific success metrics like high 3-year housing stability, low rate of substance related deaths while in housing, and rate of successful transition to non-subsidized housing.

Thanks for the spotlight on this topic!

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts